引用本文:屈宏强,邢静芳,郑雪晶,胡方舒. 基于燃烧法的天然气发热量直接测量不确定度评估[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2023, 52(1): 103-109.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 846次   下载 381 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
基于燃烧法的天然气发热量直接测量不确定度评估
屈宏强1,2,邢静芳1,2,郑雪晶3,胡方舒3
1.河北省计量监督检测研究院;2.河北省气体计量与大数据分析重点实验室 ;3.天津大学环境科学与工程学院
摘要:
目的 准确测量天然气发热量,实现天然气贸易交接公平准确。方法 以定质量式开放火焰燃烧法为原理设计了一种扩展不确定度优于0.3%(k=2)的天然气发热量直接测量实验台;在发热量理论公式的基础上,建立了天然气发热量测量数学模型,综合考虑经济成本,选定了具有适当技术指标的测量设备,以甲烷为气体样品,对天然气发热量直接测量实验台进行了不确定度评估,确定了该实验台研制的可行性,并分析了各不确定度分量的贡献率。结果 该实验台测量甲烷发热量的不确定度为0.27%(k=2)。结论 满足常用的1.0级及其以下的热值仪的发热量的量值溯源,为实验台搭建奠定了基础。 
关键词:  不确定度  发热量  甲烷  燃烧法  直接测量 
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2023.01.017
分类号:
基金项目:国家市场监督管理总局科技计划项目“天然气发热量测量方法及其溯源研究”(2020MK011)
Evaluation of direct measurement uncertainty of natural gas calorific value based on combustion method
Qu Hongqiang1,2, Xing Jingfang1,2, Zheng Xuejing3, Hu Fangshu3
1. Institute of Metrology of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China;2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Gas Metrology and Big Data Analysis, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China;3. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Abstract:
Objective The aims are to measure the calorific value of natural gas accurately and achieve a fair and accurate natural gas trade. Methods Based on the principle of the fixed-mass open flame combustion method, a direct measurement experimental platform of natural gas calorific value is designed, which has an extended uncertainty better than 0.3% (k=2). Based on the theoretical formula of calorific value, a mathematical model for measuring the calorific value of natural gas is established. Considering the economic cost comprehensively, the measurement equipment with appropriate technical indicators is selected. The uncertainty of the direct measurement experiment platform of natural gas calorific value is evaluated by taking methane as the gas sample, the feasibility of the development of the experimental platform is confirmed, and the contribution rate of each uncertainty component is analyzed. Results The uncertainty of measuring methane calorific value is 0.27%(k=2). Conclusion sThe uncertainty of measuring methane calorific value meets the value traceability of the calorific value of the commonly used 1.0 level and below calorific value meter, which lays a foundation for the establishment of the experimental platform.
Key words:  uncertainty  calorific value  methane  combustion method  direct measurement